MarcoGet Free AI Search audit →
HomeServicesCase StudiesPricingBlogNewsroomAbout
Handdrawn editorial illustration on a cream background showing the Peec MCP agent pipeline: a dashboard of charts on the left connected by an MCP USB-C cable to a friendly robot agent in the centre, which passes through a human-approval clipboard with a checkmark to shipped outputs on the right — a content document and a JSON-LD schema block
AI SearchPeecMCPModel Context ProtocolAEOGEOAI AgentsAI Search AgentSchmitdyCitation Share

How to Build AI Agents on the Peec AI MCP for AEO and GEO (2026)

Marco Lobo
·9 min read

TL;DR

  • In late 2025 Peec AI shipped an official MCP server, which makes its entire AI-search measurement layer — projects, prompts, brand visibility per engine, full AI answer transcripts, the source/citation graph, and scored Actions — directly callable by an LLM agent.
  • That means you can wire a Claude or GPT agent straight to the ground truth of how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews actually answer your category — and have it reason over the data, then draft the work to close the gaps.
  • The build pattern is a five-stage read-only loop: baseline → find the gap → read the answers → pull the recommendations → draft the work package, with a human ship gate before anything publishes.
  • The honest part: the agent triages and drafts; a human verifies and ships. Dashboards measure; the agent + human move the number.

Written by Schmitdy — we build production agents on the Peec MCP. Last updated June 2026.

The bottom line

The Peec MCP turns AI-search measurement into something an agent can act on — baseline the category, find the off-domain gaps, read the actual answers, and draft the work to close them, with a human shipping the result. The data is finally agent-callable; the execution is still where the value is. Start with the source gap. Then move the answer.

If you'd rather not build and run the agent yourself, that's exactly what Schmitdy does: an AI-search agent built on this pattern, with humans on quality and outreach.

Frequently Asked Questions

AI SearchPeecMCPModel Context ProtocolAEOGEOAI AgentsAI Search AgentSchmitdyCitation Share
Marco Lobo
Marco Lobo

Founder, Schmitdy

Marco builds AI search growth systems that turn prompts, sources, content, and agents into revenue.

LinkedInX / Twitter

Related Articles

Handdrawn editorial illustration on a cream background split into three panels: on the left, a dashboard with a gauge and bar chart labelled tool; in the middle, three people standing together labelled agency; on the right, a friendly robot wearing a headset talking with a person labelled agent — the three layers of improving AI search visibility
AI Search7 min read

AI Search Tool vs Agency vs Agent: Which Do You Actually Need in 2026?

There are three ways to improve your AI search visibility, and they're layers of the same stack, not rivals: a tool (Peec, Profound) measures where you stand; an agency executes the optimisation work with people; an agent — an AI-search agent — does the recurring volume under human review. A tool changes your understanding, not the answer. An agency changes the answer but costs the most and moves at human speed. An agent does the volume at mid-market cost with humans owning quality and strategy. In 2026 most teams keep a tool and add one execution layer — the real decision is which one.

Read →
Handdrawn editorial illustration on a cream background: an AI-search dashboard of charts and a magnifying glass on the left feeds through a funnel in the centre, which sorts into three citation chips — a review star, a community comment, and a reference source — that flow into an AI answer speech bubble on the right; the path from dashboard data to AI citations
AI Search7 min read

From Peec or Profound Data to AI Citations: A 5-Step Playbook (2026)

Your Peec or Profound dashboard tells you where you're invisible in AI answers, but a visibility score is an outcome, not an instruction. Turning the data into citations is a five-step job: read the gap reports rather than the vanity metric, turn the cited sources into a third-party target list, fix the pages that are retrieved but not cited, build the off-site footprint the data points to, then re-measure the delta on a cadence. The highest-leverage move is the source/domain gap report — the third-party sites citing your competitors but not you. Most of the work lands off your own domain and has to recur, which is the gap between owning a dashboard and moving its numbers.

Read →
Handdrawn editorial illustration on a cream background splitting two worlds: on the left, a stack of classic search result pages with a search bar and ten blue ranked links labelled SEO; on the right, an AI answer speech bubble with a small robot, lines of generated text, and three cited-source chips labelled AEO / GEO, the shift from ranking links to being cited inside the AI answer
AI Search9 min read

AEO vs GEO vs SEO: The Difference, and Which One You Need in 2026

SEO ranks links in classic search. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) optimise to be cited inside the AI-generated answer in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot. AEO and GEO are near-synonyms for the same goal; SEO is a separate, still-necessary discipline that feeds the retrieval pool. The practical answer in 2026 is that you do all three, but you measure AEO/GEO on citation share, not blue-link position, and the winning levers (off-site footprint, entity authority, content shape, freshness) sit mostly off your own site.

Read →
See where AI search is already choosing your competitorsRequest the free AI Search audit and get the prompts, source gaps, and next actions that matter for pipeline.
Get Free AI Search audit →